Abstract
- Each the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are anticipated to compromise on battery life in trade for thinness.
- That is a step backwards, contemplating that nobody is asking for thinner telephones, but persons are all the time asking for extra runtime.
- It could be that the telephones are a needed step in direction of a greater future, however as rumored, they will not be getting my cash.
It looks like
iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous today, which is sensible — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars have to be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the tens of millions of items Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.
The newest rumor (by way of The Information), is that with a view to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the
iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inside testing means that simply 60 to 70% of householders will have the ability to make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even mentioned to be making ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t provided for the reason that discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.
Comparable rumors have emerged round Samsung’s
Galaxy S25 Edge
. In keeping with WinFuture, the telephone might have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however under the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers larger numbers.
Associated
Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated
Probably, however you should not get one straight from Apple.
Dealing with the established order
As a tech journalist, I may be an exception, however I discover that the majority telephones nonetheless haven’t got sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present each day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which based on Apple, needs to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In follow, nevertheless, I am struggling to think about how that could possibly be attainable. I wish to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I am going to typically see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is attainable for the battery to dip under 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of largely non-video exercise. If I really spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I would in all probability need to put my telephone in Low Energy Mode in some unspecified time in the future.
This 12 months, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.
I would say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung seem like headed within the improper route, however actually, it is not. Each corporations have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in principle, attainable to make it over a day in case you’ve acquired a telephone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with mild utilization. Certainly, battery life has all the time performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because greater batteries are costly whereas being robust to use in advertising and marketing campaigns. A 6.9-inch display screen or a 10X telephoto lens is instantly spectacular — it is tougher to wow folks with an additional two or three hours of runtime.
This 12 months, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It’ll entice some folks, actually, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the difficulty appears to be that telephones have develop into unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Steel and glass could also be good aesthetically — however and not using a case, skinny gadgets like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they might slip out of my fingers with one improper gesture.

Associated
The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones
So near price range nirvana, but to date.
A worrisome route for the long run
Misusing the newest tech
Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be primarily based on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with larger vitality density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in a couple of telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.
If that’s the case, I am anxious {that a} dangerous precedent is rising. After I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we would get extra longevity out of telephones the identical measurement, or a minimum of equal longevity from barely smaller gadgets. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we could possibly be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus. That might take the trade backward at a time when persons are extra depending on smartphones than ever.
To be truthful, Apple and Samsung could also be attempting to maintain components prices down and retail costs in examine. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to supply for the time being, so even attempting to match the capacities of ordinary lithium-ion batteries could also be tough and not using a chew into revenue margins. It could possibly be that when manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — perhaps Apple will really ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.
Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we’ll inevitably be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus.
Alongside these traces, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a objective just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a
Face ID
digital camera, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it attainable to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. Nowadays, even the $599
iPhone 16e
shares these options.
Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at reasonably priced costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can depend me out of gadgets that cut back battery life with none tangible advantages. It’s going to hardly matter how cool a telephone appears to be like sliding out of my pocket if I am unable to make it to the fitness center and again with out plugging into my automotive — or from Alberta to Texas and not using a battery pack or charging through the flight’s layover. I suppose I am going to nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.

You may additionally like
Everything you need to know about PEVs, or personal electric vehicles
You should use PEVs to discover, run errands, or velocity up your commute.
Trending Merchandise

SAMSUNG 34″ ViewFinity S50GC Collection Ultr...

Logitech MK120 Wired Keyboard and Mouse Combo for ...

HP 330 Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo – 2...

Sceptre Curved 24-inch Gaming Monitor 1080p R1500 ...

ASUS RT-AX1800S Twin Band WiFi 6 Extendable Router...

HP 24mh FHD Pc Monitor with 23.8-Inch IPS Show (10...

NETGEAR Nighthawk WiFi 6E Router (RAXE300) | AXE78...
